Weeding Library Collections - Public Libraries Online https://publiclibrariesonline.org A Publication of the Public Library Association Thu, 20 Dec 2018 18:40:09 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5 Weeding — Love It or Hate It https://publiclibrariesonline.org/2018/02/weeding-love-it-or-hate-it/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=weeding-love-it-or-hate-it https://publiclibrariesonline.org/2018/02/weeding-love-it-or-hate-it/#respond Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:14:40 +0000 http://publiclibrariesonline.org/?p=13235 Whether a library employee has taken a collection development class or not, most people working in a library have either heard of the CREW method of weeding materials or use the acronym MUSTIE when removing items from the collection. However, judging by the number of pictures posted to Facebook (of outlandish items still found on library shelves), it seems that not as much weeding is being done in libraries as should be. The question is, why are some of these items still on shelves and does a lack of weeding mean something more than it appears on the surface?

The post Weeding — Love It or Hate It first appeared on Public Libraries Online.

]]>
Whether a library employee has taken a collection development class or not, most people working in a library have either heard of the CREW method of weeding materials or use the acronym MUSTIE when removing items from the collection. However, judging by the number of pictures posted to Facebook (of outlandish items still found on library shelves), it seems that not as much weeding is being done in libraries as should be. The question is, why are some of these items still on shelves and does a lack of weeding mean something more than it appears on the surface?

We have some folks on our staff who are new to weeding the collections and in working with them, we have found that there are more emotions bound up in weeding than we had ever realized. The “cleaner-uppers” vs. the “collectors” – this is a big issue on staff. Some people are very dispassionate about weeding and take an almost clinical approach. If it fits the criteria for removal then it goes, no questions asked. For the collectors on staff, getting rid of something that might possibly be of use to someone (even if it hasn’t been used in a while) is a ludicrous idea! We have seen how these differences of philosophy can create hard feelings among staff members.

As part of a consortium of libraries, the chance that an item may circulate well somewhere and then still be available to everyone is great. Often it is easier to get rid of an individual item in one place if the “someone who might need it sometime” can still get the item in question from somewhere else.

Who bought the material – this issue can go one of two ways. Staff can be more reticent to weed materials they themselves purchased because they perceive it as an admission that they didn’t pick an item that the community really loved and used all the time. Sometimes weeding can be gleeful if for staff the weeding is about removing the memory of a staff member that has left the library and purchased items the staff viewed as unnecessary. The challenge with this is that the staff must take an objective view of the item within the library’s weeding guidelines and not associate items with a particular person.

Duplicate items – there are multiple ideas about how to evaluate whether duplicate items should be weeded from a collection. This too has been a recent point of discussion in our library. We tend to purchase multiple copies of items, but when to cull the additional copies can be a question. Some  treat each copy of a title as a separate item evaluating it individually; while others consider the total number of circulations for all copies.

Who has the final say – this can be a sore point with staff, particularly if there are some aggressive weeders on staff pitted against equally aggressive savers. Is it an administrator who makes the final decision? Is it a neutral third party? Is it the public (by having a “last chance” shelf)? The person with the final say must be aware that there going to be staff that don’t agree with the decision.

General workload – this may seem like an obvious statement, but is the staff overworked? If people in the library are trying to do the work of two people in the time of one, then something will have to not get done. Frequently the job that is put aside is weeding. Particularly in small libraries with small staff, getting items off shelves is not nearly so important as getting new items out to patrons. Sometimes weeding is as simple as making it a priority at a particular time of year and literally clearing the calendar of other activities. Having a set time to weed can make it easier to get the job accomplished.

Every library ends up with their own process for weeding. It is a combination of the dispassionate guidelines of the CREW method and the compassion and respect that staff have for each other and their opinions. However, if it gets to a point that it seems like there are many items on shelves that shouldn’t be there, then it is time to ask, what else is going on with the staff and why are the collections in the shape they are in?

The post Weeding — Love It or Hate It first appeared on Public Libraries Online.

]]>
https://publiclibrariesonline.org/2018/02/weeding-love-it-or-hate-it/feed/ 0
Not Everything with Books is a Library https://publiclibrariesonline.org/2016/09/not-everything-with-books-is-a-library/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=not-everything-with-books-is-a-library https://publiclibrariesonline.org/2016/09/not-everything-with-books-is-a-library/#respond Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:55:23 +0000 http://publiclibrariesonline.org/?p=10461 If you closely follow library stories across the world you may have come across this heartwarming one: A small rural public school's largely abandoned library in Las Plumas County, California, was so outdated that it was unusable. A local writer, Margaret Garcia, had a dream of reopening this library, so she put out a call on her blog for people to send a book. Her blog post went viral and people sent in 47 million books!

The post Not Everything with Books is a Library first appeared on Public Libraries Online.

]]>

If you closely follow library stories across the world you may have come across this heartwarming one: A small rural public school’s largely abandoned library in Las Plumas County, California, was so outdated that it was unusable. A local writer, Margaret Garcia, had a dream of reopening this library, so she put out a call on her blog for people to send a book. Her blog post went viral and people sent in 47 million books!

I may not have that exact number correct. Indeed all of my facts here are like unto a crayon rendering of the actual story. But the main point is there were a lot of books donated. So many books that they’re reopening the library and don’t want any more books —just gift cards, money, and shelving.

If you haven’t before heard this story you have heard one like it. It is a man jumps in a flooded river to save a dog story. It is a whole town takes in a refugee story. It is hard to fault the story because it seems to restore faith in destiny, in generosity, and in the kindness of strangers. It says despite the problems out there with proper school library funding this good will can solve problems and make things better. And above all it says that people really care about books and libraries.

I am here to rain on your parade.

But don’t worry, the rain will cool off your heated excitement that might cause you to whisk out to buy an expensive hardcover copy of your favorite book to send to Las Plumas County. You may be able to afford one of those fancy hardcovers, but can you afford 4,000 of them? Because you know in your calm and rain cooled heart that there are surely 3,999 school libraries who could really use that book. Las Plumas is merely today’s lucky winner on the Internet. Everyone else lost.

Novelty news stories, stories of library lottery winners are fine, but they tell a shadow story. They secretly tell a story about that which is normal. School libraries founder and die all the time. They tell an unspoken story about all the lottery losers. And they weave a fantasy solution about books, libraries, and the power of the Internet. It is a cozy notion that libraries are simply books and by each of us donating a few books we can make a library. It is a less cozy notion that a library is good shelving; a viable cataloging system; a pleasant, safe space to be in with decent furniture and good light. And perhaps it is the least cozy notion of all that a library too is probably a person getting paid $56,880 dollars a year to deal with it all. The Las Plumas Library is going to need most of that to be a library. And in the excitement of the moment they may even get a large enough portion for a start. But they will need it next year and the year after that as well. Because in ten years, when their collection is sadly outdated again, and their library is closing from lack of school support, another one-in-a-million shot on the Internet is unlikely to hit again. Remember this: everything you see on the Internet also stands in for a million things no one sees.

I work in a large library in a big city and rarely does a day go by where I am not dealing with book donations. Like the generous donations to the Las Plumas Library they may be intended to save us too. I think we regularly get more donations than they even received in the bonanza in Plumas County. Sadly ours mostly consist of yellowed Ham and Pineapple Cookbooks from the fifties and the early works of Danielle Steele in vintage book club editions that have been fully seasoned by a couple decades of storage in a basement. There’s not much we can do with this stuff other than trying to trick people into buying them or furtively recycling them when that fails. All our donations together provide a rare few items we add to the collection and a small stream of miscellaneous income. If you took all the vast thousands of donated books we receive in a year you would not have a library. You would have a rummage sale. Which we do, twice a year.

But we do have a pretty good tax base here in my city. And a just steady enough commitment to libraries. The people of my county join together as The Friends of the Library to raise money and advocate. And these people also just manage to not elect charlatans who appeal to their flashes of emotion and tell them that we need not pay for anything good as a community. It can be taken care of by trusting to the largess of strangers. Rather they elect people who believe that the kindness of wealthy strangers that will save us is already ours, collectively, and the best way to save ourselves is to make sure that along with roads and water and sewers we first have libraries. This allows us to have a greasy but up to date collection of books and movies. It means we have shelving. We have great windows full of light, places to sit, and proper recessed lighting inside as well. And we have librarians, many of them, some good and some not so much. We have clerks and student workers and volunteers and board members, computer people and computers, and open doors seven days a week. We are a library. I am confident we will be around in five years. I am not so sure about the one in Plumas County. We in no real way rely upon the kindness of strangers. No library should have to, and very few that ever do will thrive, let alone survive.

The post Not Everything with Books is a Library first appeared on Public Libraries Online.

]]>
https://publiclibrariesonline.org/2016/09/not-everything-with-books-is-a-library/feed/ 0
FYI Podcast – Weeding Library Collections https://publiclibrariesonline.org/2016/08/weeding-library-collection-fyi-podcast-episode-13/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=weeding-library-collection-fyi-podcast-episode-13 https://publiclibrariesonline.org/2016/08/weeding-library-collection-fyi-podcast-episode-13/#respond Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:45:36 +0000 http://publiclibrariesonline.org/?p=10306 Kathleen Hughes, PLA Manager Publications, talks to Holly Hibner and Mary Kelly about weeding library collections, awful library books they've discovered, and more. Holly and Mary have recently released a book in PLA’s Quick Reads series, entitled “Weeding Manual.” In addition, they are cofounders of the popular blog Awful Library Book (awfullibrarybooks.com) and co-authors of the book “Making Your Collection Count: A Holistic Approach to Library Collection Management.” Holly Hibner is adult services coordinator at Plymouth District Library in Plymouth, Michigan and Mary Kelly is youth services librarian at the Lyons Township Library in Michigan.

The post FYI Podcast – Weeding Library Collections first appeared on Public Libraries Online.

]]>
Kathleen Hughes, PLA Manager Publications, talks to Holly Hibner and Mary Kelly about weeding library collections, awful library books they’ve discovered, and more. Holly and Mary have recently released a book in PLA’s Quick Reads series, entitled “Weeding Manual.” In addition, they are cofounders of the popular blog Awful Library Book (awfullibrarybooks.com) and co-authors of the book “Making Your Collection Count: A Holistic Approach to Library Collection Management.” Holly Hibner is adult services coordinator at Plymouth District Library in Plymouth, Michigan and Mary Kelly is youth services librarian at the Lyons Township Library in Michigan.

Resources Related to This Podcast:

The PLA Quick Reads Series

Weeding Manual

Awful Library Books

 

 

 

 

 

 

The post FYI Podcast – Weeding Library Collections first appeared on Public Libraries Online.

]]>
https://publiclibrariesonline.org/2016/08/weeding-library-collection-fyi-podcast-episode-13/feed/ 0