User talk:Contributor2020

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Contributor2020!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rock Beach in Pondicherry at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Why should this be considered for VI please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your question, Charlesjsharp. I think that this image is a valued image as it is the only image in the scope in the specific time frame stated, midnight. I also consider the scope as broad as there are many images in the category (although all are in daytime) and is a famous landmark in the union territory of Puducherry. These images are also of a decent quality and geocoding is present too. It also is according to all of the other criterias for a Valued Image. Thus, this image should be considered for COM:VI Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 14:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Thanks for your comments. I would select a daytime image for VI. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

  I beg to differ, Charlesjsharp. Let us take upon the criterions that is for COM:VI

  1.) Is the most valuable illustration of its kind on Wikimedia Commons - it is, due to the fact that "the kind" of images is nighttime, and there are no images of this kind.

  2.) Is nominated as being the most valuable within a suitably generic scope - it is, as the scope is quite famous within the union territory of Puducherry (most probably the beach is famous with the whole of South India.

  3.) Must illustrate its subject well - it is, as the picture is of a decent quality for this type of a kind, and describes its subject clearly.

  4.) Is fully described on the image page. - image is sufficiently described on the image page.

  5.) Is geocoded, when relevant. - it is.

  6.) Is well categorized at an appropriate level - the category has 25 images, which seems to be reasonably sufficient.
  

  This is my opinion, however I politely request you to look upon the nomination with an open mind again. Thank you, Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 08:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment The VI guidelines state that In general, 'the VI for a building scope should be a daylight picture'. Surely the same should apply for a beach? Also, the guidelines state that 'a natural site should be of more than local interest to justify a scope'. Does this beach have more than local interest? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

  Thank you for your questions, Charlesjsharp. Starting with the 2nd question, Rock Beach in Puducherry stands out as more than just a local attraction due to its various facets. Its geological features, characterized by rocky formations and boulders, attract the interest of geologists and researchers studying coastal formations. Furthermore, the beach serves as a prominent tourist destination, drawing visitors from far and wide with its scenic beauty and unique shoreline. Beyond its aesthetic appeal, Rock Beach plays a crucial role in supporting diverse marine life, making it an ecologically important site. Additionally, the beach holds cultural significance, serving as a favored spot for leisure activities and gatherings, while also reflecting Puducherry's colonial history through landmarks like the French War Memorial. Overall, Rock Beach in Puducherry stands as a multifaceted natural site that combines geological, ecological, cultural, and historical significance. Now, going about the first question, there are instances where capturing beach images during other times of the day can also produce compelling and valuable photographs. Also, night-time beach photography can showcase unique features such as illuminated structures and many, many more and these alternative time-of-day shots can offer viewers a different perspectives. These conditions do not apply for a image of a building and thus, according to me, the specific guideline for a building image should not reflect upon an image of a beach.

  TL;DR - Rock Beach in Puducherry is not just a local attraction; it encompasses geological, ecological, cultural, and historical significance. Its rocky formations attract researchers, while tourists are drawn to its scenic beauty. The beach supports diverse marine life and reflects Puducherry's colonial past. However, regarding the guideline for beach images, alternative lighting conditions can also produce valuable photographs, unlike for buildings, suggesting that specific guidelines for buildings should not necessarily apply to beach images. Thank you, Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 10:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for the detailed response. You'll probably get a second support vote to break the tie! Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Midnight seems like too specific a time for a scope, except for New Year's lights or something. How about "at night"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done @Ikan Kekek: --Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 19:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

• Thanks.  Support, as this is the longest night view of the beach. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.

All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

If you use the helper gadget, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Contributor2020, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.

Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! FitIndia ^Semi-retired 17:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Review images

Hello Contributor2020, Can you please review these images?:

• File:Harold Torres.png
• File:Harold Torres 2.png

Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

@Contributor2020 Please. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 01:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done, Aurelio de Sandoval. Contributor2020^{Talk to me here!} 04:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

@Contributor2020 Please be careful when reviewing images, I have nominated both of them for deletion given the fact that they are likely copyvios. See license review and license laundering for things you should check for when reviewing. Again, please check more than just the surface. Thank you, Seawolf35 (talk) 13:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

I am really, really sorry Seawolf35. This is completely my fault. My inability to check other uploads of the user was as the request came from another fellow license reviewer, but it is complete failure on my part. I will completely make sure this never, ever happens again. Contributor2020^{Talk to me here!} 13:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

A friendly reminder. Don't rush at all. The backlog is definitely huge. But you can pause for a while, go through and read all policies. Just focus on quality and not on quantity. Still, if you have doubts you can ask or leave it for others. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 17:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice. I am doing the same. Contributor2020^{Talk to me here!} 08:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Multiple DRs

When you post more than two or three DRs of related subjects as you did with File:N837JM at KHPN.jpg, please use Visual File Change. It is much faster for you and for the closing Admin. Thank you, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Jameslwoodward, thank your for your advice. Even though I don't use the tool and it may help me in the future, the file linked was not nominated for deletion by me, rather it was marked as  Keep by me. I don't think so that the tool could be used for executing mass keep. Anyways still, thank you for the recommendation and will surely try it when I can. Contributor2020^{Talk to me here!} 14:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Apologies for picking off the wrong player -- you can do custom replacements with the tool, which would include a mass keep, but Admins use DelReqHandler which also has a mass keep or delete function. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)